Breaking News Bar
updated: 12/14/2011 5:15 AM

Dist. 220 catches another non-resident student

hello
Success - Article sent! close
 
 

Barrington Unit District 220 officials have again been forced to take the rare action of disenrolling an out-of-district student whose residency information had been falsified.

Though residency investigations do occasionally uncover such circumstances, they usually resolve themselves by the student withdrawing from the district without the school board having to take any action, District 220 Superintendent Tom Leonard said.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

Before Tuesday's vote to disenroll one younger student, the last time such a vote had been required was in May 2010 when six students from among four families were disenrolled for nonresidency.

And that was the first time such an issue had come before the board in at least the previous seven years, Board President Brian Battle said.

In the most recent case, the student in question was ultimately discovered to live far east of District 220 after a letter requesting a parent-teacher conference sent to the student's registered Barrington-area address was returned, district spokesman Jeff Arnett said.

"This is one case where there was no question," Arnett said.

The student will be allowed to continue attending class in District 220 until the start of winter break at the end of this week, but will not return after the new year.

However, the student's family will be asked to pay the prorated amount of tuition for the number of days the student attended District 220 classes this fall. In District 220, the annual operational cost per student is approximately $14,000.

The district is legally required to ask for such payment, but rarely actually receives any, Leonard said. No payments were received for any of the six nonresident students disenrolled in May 2010.

The return of mail sent to a student's falsified address is one of the most common ways that suspicion of nonresidency arises, triggering an investigation, other suburban school districts have said.

Such discoveries are most often made during the spring, however, when registration papers for the following school year are mailed out.

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here