No apology needed for Christian song
In response to the article about the Wheaton Park District apologizing for a Christian song at a dance recital, I wonder why an apology was needed. As a parent, I would be concerned if there were inappropriate materials, such as immodest costumes, gyrating gestures, degrading use of words in songs, or suggestive lyrics. I would complain to the park district if the dance recital was of that nature.
Why act so offended over a Christian song? Were you equally offended when American Idol contestant, Lee DeWyze, sang Leonard Cohen's "Hallelujah?" The song is a type of gospel music with biblical references. Millions of people, religious or not, enjoyed hearing him sing it. Music is a way to express feelings and emotions, with or without accompanying words. Music can even transcend the very meaning of words.
As a Christian, I would not be offended if a Jewish or Muslim song was showcased at my daughter's recital. The park district need not send apology letters to all the families who attended. Only one family complained. One letter directed to that family would be sufficient to address their concerns. That family interpreted the song as "proselytizing" and, as a result, they were personally offended. It seems to me their complaint is misdirected. The park district, in allowing a Christian song at a dance recital, did nothing wrong. There are other things worthy of complaining.
It is a parent's responsibility to protect their children from inappropriate material that could harm or unduly influence them in a destructive way.
Christian or not, good parents protect their children against evil and injustice. The song in the recital is neither evil nor unjust. Ever wonder why it seems many non-Christians demand "tolerance" of others when they, themselves, are so intolerant of Christianity?
Stephanie Opperthauser
Schaumburg