Debate policy, but skip name-calling

In a recent edition of the Daily Herald, I read in amazement a letter to the editor "Obama much bigger threat than Osama." At first, I thought my bifocals needed an adjustment. Then I realized that this was a real letter from a real person. The writer says that only a close friend admits he voted for Obama. Well, I am a family man, small business owner, flag waving, good citizen who voted for Obama - and would enthusiastically do it again. So I guess that makes me one of your "socialists, communists, fascists and anti-Americans."

Why do I continue to support President Obama? Is it because of his intelligence, ability to look at details and the big picture and knowledge of history? Or perhaps that he is an optimist (like me) and thinks America's best days are ahead? No, I support President Obama because he is just like you and me. He loves his country, he is facing an unprecedented plate full of challenges, and is working to do his best to help us become a better, more competitive, and stronger country. Debate and disagreement over policy is always a good thing. That's how the best ideas surface. Calling names and denigrating any president of the United States (or anyone for that matter) does nothing constructive. Labels are for boxes, not people. Let the debate be about policy based on facts, not name-calling.

John Keister

Vernon Hills