Gabel endorsement is a puzzle

I wonder. How can the paper reject the so-called "FAIR" Tax while supporting machine candidates who are all in for it? Seems a puzzle for a reader to understand?

Robyn Gabel is such a puzzle. You endorse her. She is a slated, funded Madigan Machinist. She is a 10-year loyalist incumbent. She is all in for Madigan and his "Fair" tax orchestra. How can you endorse and not reject her on this so-called "Fair" tax basis alone?

I wonder what good she does other than what is good for her supreme overlord, Emperor Madigan?

Howard Sproull

Skokie