advertisement

Poll Vault: Are American Indian team names racist?

Billionaire NFL team owner Dan Snyder has so far resisted mounting pressure to rename the Washington Redskins to something more politically correct.

On the surface, the name is cringe-inducing. But ESPN's Rick Reilly wrote a thought-provoking column this week on whether American Indians are actually offended by “Redskins.”

Here in the suburbs, Naperville Central and Huntley high schools replaced “Redskins” with other mascot names (the RedHawks and Red Raiders, respectively). Antioch High School's teams are known as the Sequoits and sport a logo with Indian feathers and an arrow, but there's no tribe by that name.

Chicago's Stanley Cup champion hockey team calls itself the Blackhawks, and fans proudly wear the Indian head logo.

There is definitely a fine line between a symbol and a caricature. I think Chief Wahoo, the Cleveland Indians logo, is offensive, but I staunchly defended the use of Chief Illiniwek by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, my alma mater.

Are all American Indian team names racist? Is it possible to have a mascot that honors Indians? Which do you approve of and which do you find offensive?

Antioch High School uses American Indian imagery in its logo, even though there is no tribe known as the Sequoits.
The Chicago Blackhawks logo, proudly worn by team captain Jonathan Toews, generates relatively little protest. Associated Press
The University of IllinoisÂ’ teams are still known as the Fighting Illini, but players no longer wear Chief Illiniwek insignia. Associated Press
Article Comments
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the "flag" link in the lower-right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.