Landing Russell Wilson or Deshaun Watson isn't as simple as it sounds

  • Seattle Seahawks' Russell Wilson reacts during the second half of an NFL wild-card playoff football game against the Eagles, Sunday, Jan. 5, 2020, in Philadelphia. Unfortunately for Bears fans, Wilson, the third-highest paid QB in the NFL, won't be playing for Chicago next year.

    Seattle Seahawks' Russell Wilson reacts during the second half of an NFL wild-card playoff football game against the Eagles, Sunday, Jan. 5, 2020, in Philadelphia. Unfortunately for Bears fans, Wilson, the third-highest paid QB in the NFL, won't be playing for Chicago next year. Associated Press

 
 
Updated 2/28/2021 6:18 PM

For Bears fans trying to understand why Allen Robinson has been allowed to get within 19 days of unrestricted free agency, or why the Bears won't be trading for Russell Wilson or Deshaun Watson, this column is for you.

It is an awful year to be a free agent or a QB with a huge contract looking to make a move.

 

Flipping Matt Stafford and Jared Goff or Carson Wentz and Philip Rivers didn't have a massive impact on the Lions', Rams' or Colts' caps.

But trying to get Wilson's or Watson's contracts into Mitch Trubisky's slot would be like trying to get a size six shoe on a size 12 foot.

The NFL's new 10-year Collective Bargaining Agreement that begins with the 2021 season calls for the players to receive 48% of total football revenue or 48.8% if they add a 17th regular season game.

Because total football revenue is unknown until after the completion of any given season, annual salary caps are based on 48% of the prior season's total football revenue and then adjusted each year on a rolling basis going forward.

by signing up you agree to our terms of service
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 

The 2021 cap is currently set in the $180 million range because the league and the NFLPA made a deal that the cap would not be reduced by more than 10% this season.

Additional losses to the owners from overpaying players on the percentage they were actually due in 2020 will be "borrowed" from the 2022 cap and additional seasons beyond.

It is possible, probably likely, that the cap will go down again next year, in 2023 and beyond.

But how much?

Players and teams negotiating free agent deals in the coming weeks will be flying blind as to what the impact of those deals will be on the cap beyond this season.

In Robinson's case it is also not helpful to his pursuit of the biggest deal possible that there are a handful of other top pass catchers. Teams and players will be dragging their feet to see who is going to set the market.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 

At QB, as I've told you all repeatedly, Wilson and Watson are going to be playing in Seattle and Houston, respectively, this upcoming season.

But let's say I'm wrong. It certainly wouldn't be all that rare.

Watson and Wilson are the second and third highest paid players in the league, respectively, behind Patrick Mahomes.

There is $21.6 million in dead cap money on Watson's deal the Texans would have to eat if they trade him, and $39 million on Wilson's deal that is Seattle's problem.

But beginning in 2022 and beyond, with no idea what teams' caps are going to be, either player would come with a massive hit in the $37-million to $40-million range.

The Bears could end up in a situation where Khalil Mack and their quarterback eat up $60 million to $70 million of the cap, which would leave only $100 million or so to pay 50 other players. And they would have no first- or second-round draft choices (after trading them for a QB) to replace expensive quality players who would need to be cap casualties to make all of this work within the cap constraints.

And either QB would most likely be without a No. 1 receiver because there clearly would be no cap room for Robinson.

Can the Bears afford Robinson at any price until they know what they're doing at quarterback?

What has been lost in all the hysteria surrounding what appears to be Ryan Pace's big miss on Mitch Trubisky is it is not now his priority to fix the quarterback position at all costs.

If he is going to save his job -- and perhaps Matt Nagy's too -- his No. 1 priority is to make the Bears a legitimate contender.

Based on their current assets, he may have a much better chance of doing that with a Brad Johnson, Trent Dilfer, Joe Flacco or dare I say Nick Foles-type answer at quarterback than he does by chasing Wilson or Watson at the expense of fixing all else the Bears need to improve.

Sorry, Bears fans, but fixing your beloved franchise just isn't as simple as you hope, even if you want that shiny new toy no matter what the cost.

• Twitter: @Hub_Arkush

0 Comments
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
Article Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.