The Bears shouldn't be done in free agency until they re-sign McManis

                                                                                                                                                                                                   
  • Chicago Bears defensive back Sherrick McManis (27) lines up against the Los Angeles Chargers during an NFL football game, Sunday, Oct. 27, 2019, in Chicago.

    Chicago Bears defensive back Sherrick McManis (27) lines up against the Los Angeles Chargers during an NFL football game, Sunday, Oct. 27, 2019, in Chicago. Associated Press

 
By Arthur Arkush
aarkush@profootballweekly.com
Updated 3/28/2020 6:49 PM

It doesn't make headlines like quarterback trades and tight end travails but the Bears special teams has underwent big changes in free agency and could be poised to build on its modest but much-needed gains last season.

In safety Jordan Lucas and linebacker Barkevious Mingo, the Bears this week signed two proven-plus performers in the third phase. They've also re-signed long snapper Patrick Scales and safety Deon Bush, and reportedly brought back safety DeAndre Houston-Carson. Their busiest (linebacker Joel Iyiegbuniwe) and best (wide receiver Cordarrelle Patterson) special-teamers are entrenched, and a newcomer, such as Artie Burns, and still-unknown Devante Bond also could be ticketed for big kicking-game roles.

 

However, the Bears let homegrown special teams demon Nick Kwiatkoski leave in free agency, same as fellow linebacker Kevin Pierre-Louis, and that's before we get to their most notable free agent who remains unsigned -- Sherrick McManis.

Lest we forget, the Bears added explosive special teams depth last season, including Patterson and Pierre-Louis, but it wasn't until they learned from their early-season mistake of taking McManis' helmet that Chris Tabor's group started to fully click. In weeks two and three when McManis was a healthy scratch, his replacement Buster Skrine jumped offside on a missed point-after that gifted Denver 2 points and nearly a win, and Chicago ceded a season-high 105 kickoff return yards in Washington.

McManis' return to the field in Week 4 coincided with the Bears' best win of the season, and over the next two games, he made the critical, near-game-turning block with remarkable hustle on Tarik Cohen's punt return in London after a goal-line forced fumble that took seven points off the board, and delivered another critical assist on Cordarrelle Patterson's kickoff return score vs. the Saints.

In the game when McManis suffered a season-ending groin injury vs. the Giants, the Bears allowed their second-highest kickoff return total of 2019. It was then one step forward and two steps back, with Patterson breaking loose in Detroit to open Week 13 -- McManis' first time being inactive since Week 3 -- before the Packers' previously left-for-dead return game stung Chicago on the frozen tundra two weeks later in its best showing of the season.

by signing up you agree to our terms of service
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 

Indeed, this isn't simply a case of absence making the heart grow fonder; McManis' absence clearly had an adverse effect, whereas his return made a marked if not immediate difference last season.

Now comes the part where we remind everyone that McManis is the Bears' longest-tenured player, which means no team since Lovie Smith's penultimate group in Chicago in 2011 knows what it's like to weather a full season without the soft-spoken and versatile Northwestern product. Are we advising Ryan Pace allows sentiment to factor in his decision? Although we think McManis deserves a better Bears send-off than his trip to IR to end last season or giving up the final touchdown in the wild-card defeat two years ago, and sentiment certainly appeared to be in play with the Jimmy Graham signing and Nick Foles trade, absolutely not.

Alas, it shouldn't be required in the decision on McManis, who has proved his worth repeatedly to three separate Bears regimes. And if the current one seemingly is gravitating toward 30-somethings in its all-in-on-2020 free-agent approach, wouldn't it make sense to return the 32-year-old leader of the Bears' special teams for most of the past decade, whose most recent absence obviously hurt the unit?

0 Comments
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 

Get articles sent to your inbox.

Article Comments
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.