Development for empty-nesters backed by Fox River Grove trustees

  • Renderings of a sample home within a 110-unit rental neighborhood Redwood is hoping to build in Fox River Grove.

    Renderings of a sample home within a 110-unit rental neighborhood Redwood is hoping to build in Fox River Grove. Courtesy of village of Fox River Grove

 
 
Updated 5/23/2022 12:27 PM

Fox River Grove is moving forward with a developer's plans to build a 110-unit apartment neighborhood near Route 22 even though the planning and zoning commission said the petition should be denied.

On May 17, Fox River Grove trustees listened to a presentation by Redwood Apartment Neighborhoods, then asked village staff to bring appropriate ordinances and documents so the project could be approved at an upcoming meeting.

 

The preliminary plat calls for 110 units with each single-story home having two bedrooms, two bathrooms, a two-car garage and a back patio, said Kellie McIvor, Redwood's vice president of acquisitions.

The site plans also call for 60% open space, most of which would be on the south portion of the site where a wetland is located, McIvor said.

"It's a really good fit for this location," McIvor said. "The area is really well situated for a medium-density neighborhood."

McIvor described the aesthetic, which is consistent across Redwood homes, as providing "an attractive warm neighborhood streetscape" that would also be visible to drivers along Route 22.

Redwood expects the neighborhood would appeal to empty-nesters and those looking to age-in-place in Fox River Grove and the surrounding area, McIvor said. McIvor noted that the average age of a Redwood renter is 51 and 70% of the company's renters never had children or no longer have children living with them.

by signing up you agree to our terms of service
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 

Redwood's projections of the neighborhood demographics and the low number of kids who'd be added to the school systems are based on a sample size of over 14,000 homes within Redwood's portfolio, McIvor said.

Several residents spoke during Tuesday's meeting, asking the trustees to either reject the proposal or take a more rigorous approach before approving the plans.

"I want to see the village grow," said Fox River Grove resident Chris Gantz. "But Fox River Grove is just not ready. There have been numerous failures of planning and oversight on recent projects, and that requires the village to take a step back."

Gantz asked for more village resources -- the village currently has a part-time building and zoning service -- for expanded guidance and enforcement of codes for new building projects such as Redwood.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 

"We keep compromising, and for what gain? If we follow minimum standards, we will get a minimum result," Gantz said.

Gantz added that he was not against Redwood building a neighborhood, but that he wanted it to be the "best we've ever had in Fox River Grove" as there is limited space within the village for further growth opportunities.

Another resident, Ken Witek, said he did not believe Redwood's projection for eight children in the new neighborhood to be accurate and wondered how the neighborhood would affect local school districts and increase local property taxes.

McIvor defended Redwood's ability to manage traffic issues by saying that safety was important to the company and it had faith in the Illinois Department of Transportation's ability to recommend appropriate road improvements.

0 Comments
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
Article Comments
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.