Opinion

Clinton not worthy to be called 'warrior'

Posted June 15, 2016 1:00 am

I just finished reading Connie Schultz' article titled "Clinton is warrior we've waited for." Warrior reminds me of the word soldier or someone willing to do what is necessary even if it means putting yourself at risk. Clinton is not nor will she ever be worthy of being called a warrior.

Warriors are the men who fought for their lives after being abandoned by Clinton and the Obama administration in Benghazi. Clinton is a coward who then tried to blame the attack on a video.

The day it happened, I said it was a terrorist attack which had nothing to do with a video. So either Clinton knew about it and lied or I am more qualified to be secretary of state.

Let's not throw words like warrior around to describe people unless they are truly worthy of such accolades.

Rick Meyers

Mount Prospect

Article Comments

Article Comments

Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the "flag" link in the lower-right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.