We can't even predict tomorrow's weather
It's difficult to believe that the Climate Crisis solution is settled no matter what the so-called experts say. The usual way to settle the science is to allow other scientists to use the same information and perform the same process, which would end with the same results. That won't happen now since the data used was destroyed or is kept hidden from others as demonstrated in the climate-gate e-mails.
Further questions into this issue lend more doubt in the findings since the lead scientist stepped down and refuses to be questioned. Even peer review raises more questions because many scientific peers were ignored because they questioned the results being used by the U.N.
Weather forecasters are unable to predict the weather accurately for just a few days from now. How then can we believe that scientists/climatologists can accurately predict temperature fluctuations 20, 50, or 100 years from now?
About 50 years ago experts were predicting global cooling. They espoused that we were all going to freeze to death in the coming years. Obviously that never happened. When looking at geology, scientists have noticed varying climate cycles (cooling/warming) over millions and billions of years. The average person would conclude that to be normal.
The science is not settled. What we have is a nonscientific debate on climate. Some believe humans have an affect on the climate while others don't. Ideology and philosophy are not enough to end the debate. Until the science can be replicated a number of times by a number of different scientists we will always have this debate. There is no absolute truth to warrant spending billions on a project that won't make a significant difference to affect climate change.
Wayne Oras Sr.
Schaumburg