advertisement

Residents to blame for U-46 fiasco

A great big attaboy to Mr. Hallow of North Aurora for his Sept. 15 letter on how to make school taxes fairer. That has been my personal opinion for many years, but he did the math that I never did.

I totally agree that as homeowners, a good school system is in our best interest as far as property values go. However, come the time when you haven't had children in the schools for many years and the property taxes are going to force you to sell and move, an adjustment needs to come into play.

Every property owner should pay a base amount, but from there, it should be based on how many children you are putting into the system. This would apply to renters, owners etc. and the parcel number would be a perfect way to apply those charges.

When the school portion of your tax bill reaches 67 percent of the total, you can count on a taxpayer voting "no" on a school referendum. After what the U-46 school board has shoved down our throats with this Connie Neale fiasco, it will never see a "yes" vote from this household.

Then Ken Kaczynski says we (the taxpayers) really need to put this behind us and move on. I'm ready to move on as soon as he and Karen Carney resign their positions and the Neale contract is made null and void. Expect a lawsuit? U-46 should be an expert in lawsuits by now. I would rather pay a lawyer than Neale anyway.

Do this all in closed meetings and then refuse to make the minutes available to the public?

We have the right to know what is going on with our tax dollars at these closed door meetings, and not have to find out when Dan Rich resigned.

Then Kaczynski has the gall to tell us they did not know what Neale's plans were. We all knew she was gone the minute the details of that contract hit the press. Is he totally clueless? If so, he should not be a school board president. It sounds more like he should be working for Gov. Blagojevich's office.

If the voters/taxpayers are unhappy with the current situation, they have nobody to blame but themselves. They chose to vote for those on the board or didn't bother to vote at all, which is like a "yes" vote for a bad administration.

When you have a 10 to 15 percent turnout for an election with school board positions on it, you get what you pay for.

Donald Berger

Elgin

Article Comments
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the "flag" link in the lower-right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.