One-world rule is close at hand

The push for a one-world government is getting stronger. The evidence is astounding although not being generally reported by most media outlets. The U.N. is sponsoring a Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen next month. Hans Christian Andersen would roll over in his grave.

Politicians are keeping pretty quiet about it, too. Yes, those same politicians who voted to bankrupt the country with the Obama/Pelosi overkill health care fiasco.

Because the evidence is contradicting the previously promoted "global warming," the name has been changed to climate change. The agenda, however, has not changed. One of the provisions of this treaty is for a "government" with the power to directly intervene in the economic, tax and environmental affairs of every nation that signs it.

The justification for this "government" is enforcement. That's not enough to cause concern? Well, how about this: the treaty requires developed countries (like the U.S.) to repay their so-called "climate debt" to impossibly reduce global emissions, and to pay hefty fines if they don't.

Enforcing these requirements and managing these funds would necessitate a pretty sophisticated governmental bureaucracy. And what would happen if we or other developed countries refused to pay this so-called "debt", etc.? Would this global governing entity have its own police force to make us pay? Or what? Our sadly ill-informed president says he will sign this treaty. Hopefully, the Senate would reject it as it did the Kyoto Protocol, which would have created even greater hardship on our economy and employment rates than that which we are already suffering. Hopefully, the Senate will also reject the health care bill the House passed by only five votes and will enact something that truly solves the health care problems not creates many new ones.

P.J. Bertrand

Wood Dale