advertisement

Should the Bears extend wide receiver Darnell Mooney?

Some big decisions are looming for Bears general manager Ryan Poles.

The NFL combine begins next week, free agency is on the horizon and the draft is right around the corner. Besides those major offseason milestones, Poles has several young stars on his team who could be in line for contract extensions in the near future.

Receiver Darnell Mooney is one such player. In 2023, Mooney heads into the final year of his rookie contract. He is due for an extension and a pay raise, or he will hit free agency in 2024. Mooney has emerged as a fan favorite and one of the team's only reliable receivers.

Production comparison

Wide receiver is one of the hardest positions to figure out. The lengths and total costs of contracts vary widely. Much like quarterbacks, receivers are making far more money than they were even 10 years ago.

The 2020 draft class has a number of quality receivers who are now eligible for extensions. First-round picks have a fifth-year team option, so Justin Jefferson, CeeDee Lamb and Jerry Jeudy don't necessarily need extensions yet, but are eligible. Beyond the first round, Tee Higgins, Michael Pittman Jr., Chase Claypool, Gabe Davis and Mooney are all entering the final year of their rookie contracts.

The NFL world gasped collectively when the Jaguars signed Christian Kirk to a four-year, $72 million deal last March. The Jaguars were betting that Kirk could emerge as a No. 1 receiver if given the chance. He did emerge as the Jaguars' top receiver with his first 1,000-yard season in 2022. Before signing that big deal, Kirk's production in Arizona nearly mirrored what Mooney has done in three seasons in Chicago.

Another similar comparison in terms of past production is Michael Gallup, who earned a five-year, $62.5 million extension with Dallas last year. The Kirk contract and the Gallup contract are two very different deals for essentially the same level of production. The catch might be that Gallup wasn't the team's best receiver (that would be Lamb) and he was coming off a major injury.

Mooney can at least say that he has been the Bears' best receiver for two years. He has one 1,000-yard season to his name. His touchdown numbers are low, but his production levels are fairly consistent over his three seasons. He's also a team player who everyone at Halas Hall seems to respect.

Wear and tear

Mooney missed the final five regular season games in 2022 with an ankle injury, and previously missed one playoff game following the 2020 regular season. Otherwise, he has been healthy. He's small for the position, weighing in at only 173 pounds last season. That could be a concern for his long-term durability in the NFL.

Salary cap implications

The Bears have $98 million in available salary cap space in 2023. Money is not an issue for Poles. He has left himself plenty of space to extend multiple core players, if he so chooses.

Why it is, or isn't, a good fit

Even with similar production, it's jarring to imagine Mooney making Kirk-type money. Then again, it was hard to imagine Kirk receiving the contract he did. Mooney and his agent should absolutely be seeking Kirk's $18 million per year salary. Unfortunately, for teams across the league, the Jaguars set the bar astronomically high with that contract. For Mooney, and really any NFL receiver with decent production, the conversation starts there. Mooney and his camp can make a real argument that he is worth every penny Kirk was.

Even if Poles isn't willing to shell out $18 million a year for Mooney, he should be ready to spend at least $16 million a year, similar to what the Raiders gave to Hunter Renfrow. Something like a three-year, $48 million extension with $30 million guaranteed could be the type of deal that would make both sides happy. Given what the market is for receivers, in this day and age, that would be considered a relatively team-friendly deal.

If Mooney wants to join the $20 million per year club, he would probably have to bet on himself and play out the 2023 season first in hopes of a monster year.

Article Comments
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the "flag" link in the lower-right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.