advertisement

Hillary is not the woman we need as president

This is my response to Connie Schultz' article last week railing against Trump: Oh please! So you are telling us that the reason you voted for Obama was because he is black, and the reason you're voting for Clinton is because she is a woman. That's your argument in telling people not to vote for Trump?

That's the only qualification you need to make your decision?

I didn't care that we may have been making history voting Obama in, we needed to vote the person who was most qualified and he certainly wasn't it. Now you want to make history again by voting for Clinton because she's a woman but all she has done is lie and manipulate to make herself more appealing.

Do you really want another Clinton in the White House? I do not.

I am so tired of the left demonizing Trump and trying to change the minds of some with these ridiculous scare tactics of Armageddon should he be elected. I don't think you really care what he stands for, I think you would be saying the same thing about any Republican male candidate because you want a female in the White House.

Adding that little excerpt from a reader about her daddy was stomach turning. Was that supposed to bring a tear to my eye? That was really a cheap and lazy way of making your point.

I'm hoping one day we will have a woman as president but hopefully it won't be Hillary.

Debbie Beverly

Schaumburg

Article Comments
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the "flag" link in the lower-right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.