Cain allegations pale next to Clinton

I have come to expect bias from liberals and their mouthpiece, the so-called mainstream media. Lately, the hypocrisy has gone way over the top. The faux trauma and hand wringing concerning Herman Cain’s alleged behavior coming from liberals is revoltingly hypocritical.

Cain has been judged mercilessly without any substantive evidence. Liberals have made it clear that this candidate is not fit for the presidency. We don’t know if the harassment allegations are true, but I think I smell a rat called Axelrod. Regardless, we do know that Bill Clinton was involved in offensive relationships with several women including Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willy, Juanita Broderick and Monica Lewinsky, and lied to a grand jury.

Where was liberal condemnation of Bill’s behavior from the media? Where was Gloria Allred? Where was NOW? No liberals came to support these women. Why was Clinton given a pass and regarded today as a Democratic hero while Cain is somehow judged guilty and unfit to serve in the White House?

No matter what Cain may have done, it pales in comparison with the unparalleled philandering activity of Bill Clinton. If the allegations against Cain are true it seems that such actions would qualify him as a member in good standing in the Democratic Party.

Terry Schwartz

Winfield