Challengers’ ideas misrepresented

Stevenson board President Bruce Lubin recently said one of his main objectives is “continuing a culture of inclusion.” So, why is he excluding parents? In Russell Lissau’s Feb. 23 column, “Should Parents Have a Say?”, board incumbent Merv Roberts said he “does not support parental veto of book lists.” Candidate David Weisberg said he doesn’t think parents should be “micromanaging the curriculum at Stevenson.” Others are accusing the board challengers as wanting to “dictate” what is to be taught. No, no, no!

These comments grossly misrepresent what the challengers are proposing. The new candidates — Kathy Powell, Kim Brady, and Charles Cardella — simply want to create a culture of cooperation between parents and teachers. They are NOT advocating that parents have veto power over books, nor do they intend to “dictate” curriculum! They’re simply establishing a venue so parents can have a voice.

This agrees with Stevenson’s own vision statement: “Parents play an active role in the education of their children, monitor their children’s academic performance, and work collaboratively and positively with staff to maximize their children’s educational experience.”

That being said, the issue most concerning District 125 residents is spending and taxes. My property taxes to Stevenson High School have skyrocketed, despite the so-called “abatements” about which the current board so proudly boasts, as my home’s value continues to decline.

What the board has failed to tell taxpayers is that it’s raised taxes the maximum amount allowed by law for five years in a row. And, all its abatements have been temporary and most have been partial.

The three incumbents up for election have been in office a combined 64 years. I say it’s time for fresh ideas, fresh leadership, and fiscal accountability to the taxpayers of the district.

Kay Yarnovsky

Vernon Hills