Roselle candidates aren't charging to talk

I am responding to the Saturday, Feb. 5, Fence Post letter questioning the need for political parties in Roselle. The sender likened local political parties to the type found in partisan politics — sometimes mired in controlling votes and patronage. In Roselle, nothing could be further from the truth.

Political parties have been part of Roselle elections for 45-plus years. It is an opportunity to bring like minded people together to share the expense of printing literature, signs and walking neighborhoods, etc. In fact, one of the current independent candidates was part of a “party” when elected four years ago.

This system looks for candidates representing different age groups, points of view and strengths. If anyone has ever attended a village board meeting, they would certainly witness those views, plus spirited discussions on a myriad of issues. We live in a country where you can choose to run as an independent, or form a group to run as a slate. Freedom of choice is a wonderful thing.

However, there is one statement, started in a previous Daily Herald article, and perpetuated in the Fence Post letter that needs clarification. The Roselle United Party candidates are not charging people to talk to them. They have scheduled an open house, where any voter can meet the candidates and ask questions. It is on Sunday, March 20, 3 p.m. at the Ventura 21 Clubhouse in Roselle. Free and open to the public.

The pay-per-plate mentioned in the letter refers to a fundraiser planned by the RUP, similar to those held by independent candidates. The implication that paying is the only way to meet these candidates is simply untrue and those repeating it are misinformed.

Gayle Smolinski

Roselle village president