Subpoenas for past presidents?

Why did this paper decide prep football deserved the largest space on the front page, while FBI raids on moral citizens should be hidden on the second? These citizens, working to bring fairness to the world, need all the publicity they can get.

Grand juries can do less damage when they are exposed to the light, to media scrutiny. This is especially true when governments level dubious charges of aiding terrorism most of the public is growing tired of that by now. Only in the last paragraph of the Saturday, Sept. 25 article, "FBI raids anti-war activists' homes" do we learn that in many parts of the world, people who defend their families against terrorist governments are often the ones labeled terrorists.

The article informed readers that a citizen in Minneapolis is being charged for aiding the FARC, a U.S.-designated terrorist organization in Colombia. Even if this were true, readers weren't informed that the UAC is another Colombian U.S.-designated terrorist organization which has received U.S. taxpayer funding for over a decade. The money is funneled to the government and swiftly transferred to the UAC as documented in Colombian courts. To this day, the U.S. continues to ignore this fact. Where are the grand jury subpoenas on Clinton/Bush/Obama and their associated State Department officials?

Buddy Bell

Wood Dale