Better off with 'masculine' leaders?

I read a letter to the editor written by an individual who makes regular submissions who always educates. This time, however, he inspired me to reply.

His theory that people respond to masculine leadership is certainly true to a point. Our society is wired to respect and respond to those that are perceived to be strongest, loudest, etc. We are taught from an early age (especially people from my "tween" generation) that assertiveness equals aggression equals power equals good leadership.

That said, I know that our school systems are making great strides in correcting that misconception. More attention is paid to ensuring that our girls develop into young women that are confident, assertive and full of self-esteem. These are wonderful qualities in a good leader. I could also mention, with all due respect, that women have integrated both traditional "masculine" and "feminine" characteristics quite nicely over the years.

Finally, and I mean no offense to my male friends, for centuries, the world has been run by male leaders. And yet, we still have issues of senseless wars, hunger, violent behaviors toward women and animals, people not receiving adequate health care, and more. I am not assigning blame here but it does speak to the fact that it is time for a change.

I have had the opportunity to know many wonderful local leaders, both male and female. Speaking for myself, when I go to cast my vote, I choose responsible, responsive and intelligent candidates. Their race or gender really don't enter in to the decision-making process.

Linda L. Linford

Warrenville