There's a chance for adults to learn, too

The issue of whether or not to allow students to listen to the President of the United States speak to them via a webcast is not only a ridiculous issue, but opens the door to allowing more censorship in schools.

Disallowing students to hear the president's message sets the stage for our future generations of voters to make the assumption that what the president says is not important, and should not be listened to.

The excuse that the speech "may have political overtones" once again is an insult to the American way.

Schools may not put forth political views, it is true, but education involves teaching the children to listen, evaluate, discuss, and think their way through the many issues facing their lives today.

As a former teacher for 47 years, I applaud and laud the many schools' approach to allow the teachers to decide whether to show the webcast. I think age appropriateness, curriculum requirements, and time restraints, are valid criteria for the teachers, as to whether or not to show the webcast in the classroom. An active discussion probably would ensue after the program to clarify any mute points.

The teacher would then be a moderator, not a mediator. I would sincerely hope that the parents who "opt out" their children, tape the show, sit down with them in the evening, and discuss the views put forth.

Then, perhaps their youngsters will understand why they were not permitted to be part of the learning situation in the classroom. Or perhaps it would be a learning experience for the adults!

Lori Kandl

Schaumburg