Voters need to know Obama's agenda
Barack Obama is a relatively unknown quantity to most voters as was Sara Palin.
The media rushed to Alaska to investigate her background. They have yet do that with Obama.
He was given a free ride based on his speaking skills until now.
The Ayers connection isn't as bothersome as the ideas he represents (according to Dick Morris former Clinton adviser).
Obama was charged with handing out $50 million to radicalize students in Chicago schools. Did we need more radicals or better educated students?
That $50 million did not change students scores whatsoever.
Now it comes out that Acorn is under investigation for potential voter fraud in multiple states. Sen. Obama's campaign recently has given Acorn over $800,000. He also represented Acorn officials as their lawyer and ran training classes for them.
The important point is his continued relations with radical people and organizations.
The Republican National Committee began running ads to emphasize these points. All of a sudden, the Democratic National Committee and Obama backers raise the race card issue.
If one recalls, the race card also came up in the primaries.
I am not a racist, but the more I hear about his past and his references to wealth equalization, the more I believe his agenda is racially based on his past and present associates' philosophies.
He talks about 95 percent of us will see no tax increase.
He doesn't mention 41 percent don't pay any taxes anyway.
The question arises with the additional programs he is suggesting, will that 5 percent be able to financially support his agenda? The answer is no.
His idea will give that 41 percent a reimbursement check from the rest of us.
Is this his idea of "economic and social justice?"
These are things not covered by the mainstream media, and they should be.
There will be change after the elections, but will it be the kind of change we wanted?
Socialism is not what our founding fathers had in mind when they drafted the constitution.
Wayne Oras Sr.
Schaumburg