Don't forget about people with asthma

In response to "Dogs that are a help, not a hindrance," (Dec. 6 editorial) I applaud your article.

These well-trained dogs must definitely be separated from being categorized as "pets." I understand they are trained to help the disabled and I whole-heartedly believe that people come first, especially with the aid of a trained dog.

But as much as I applaud your article, I would expect the same understanding in return and the same compassion for the asthma and allergy sufferers who are subjected daily to the exposure of any animal or its dander that could cause severe reactions leading to life-threatening conditions.

So, while I agree that the disabled should be allowed to bring their trained dogs with them in public establishments, there still should be some limits considered for the health of others who simply may not be able to bear the animal next to them.

To help solve this problem (yet it won't eliminate it), I would like to see all public establishments put effort into setting designated, specific areas (specific hotel rooms, specific rows in an airplane, specific tables in a restaurant, etc.) for trained dogs or pets and alerting all customers that in these specific areas only, animals are allowed. Then, those with severe asthma and allergies are alerted to the increased risk they not only face on a daily basis, but can also be somewhat comforted that the next seat in a restaurant, next seat on an airplane, or next hotel room has been maintained as "pet-free" or "animal-free."

Guidelines set by the ADA should consider the life-threatening allergic reactions that could be inflicted on others, and public establishment s should consider this as well.

Joanne DiGuido

Vernon Hills

Co-Director and Founder

Asthma Cares Network