Black women feel sting of 'traumatizing' Jackson hearings

  • FILE - Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson testifies during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 23, 2022. The Harvard-educated Jackson is making history, the first Black woman nominated in the court's 233 years.

    FILE - Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson testifies during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 23, 2022. The Harvard-educated Jackson is making history, the first Black woman nominated in the court's 233 years. Associated Press

  • FILE - Melanie Campbell, president of the National Coalition on Civic Participation, speaks to a reporter on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 15, 2015. Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson has had to endure hours of public scrutiny from skeptics, something familiar to many Black women. For Campbell, 'œIt was really traumatizing to watch,' she said.

    FILE - Melanie Campbell, president of the National Coalition on Civic Participation, speaks to a reporter on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 15, 2015. Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson has had to endure hours of public scrutiny from skeptics, something familiar to many Black women. For Campbell, 'œIt was really traumatizing to watch,' she said. Associated Press

  • FILE - Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, asks a question of Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 23, 2022, during her confirmation hearing.

    FILE - Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, asks a question of Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 23, 2022, during her confirmation hearing. Associated Press

  • FILE - Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson answers a question by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, as she testifies during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 22, 2022. Jackson has had to endure hours of public scrutiny from skeptics, something familiar to many Black women. The Harvard-educated Jackson is making history, the first Black woman nominated in the court's 233 years.

    FILE - Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson answers a question by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, as she testifies during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 22, 2022. Jackson has had to endure hours of public scrutiny from skeptics, something familiar to many Black women. The Harvard-educated Jackson is making history, the first Black woman nominated in the court's 233 years. Associated Press

  • Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., questions Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 22, 2022.

    Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., questions Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 22, 2022. Associated Press

  • Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., questions Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson during a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 23, 2022.

    Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., questions Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson during a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 23, 2022. Associated Press

  • Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., questions Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson during a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 23, 2022.

    Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., questions Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson during a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 23, 2022. Associated Press

 
 
Updated 3/26/2022 3:03 PM

NEW YORK -- 'œSenator,' she said, letting out an audible sigh.

In that singular moment, Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson spoke for countless Black women who have had to gather all the patience, strength and grace within to answer insinuating questions about their credentials, qualifications and character.

 

It was Day One of questioning at the Senate Judiciary Committee as the Harvard-educated Jackson, the first Black woman to be nominated for the nation's highest court, was making history.

The federal judge had to endure hours of public scrutiny from skeptics, namely the Republican senators who are erecting a wall of opposition to her landmark nomination, the first in the court's 233-year history, and may vote en bloc against her confirmation.

'œIt was really traumatizing to watch,' said Melanie L. Campbell, president and CEO of the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation and convener of the Black Women's Roundtable.

From questioning of Jackson's view of books on critical race theory that drew her exasperated sigh - 'œThey don't come up in my work as a judge,' she said - to the loaded suggestion that the sentences she imposed on child pornography defendants were too lenient, the questions from the Republicans tapped into long-standing American grievances over race, class and public safety.

by signing up you agree to our terms of service
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 

The insinuations that Jackson, a distinguished jurist and mother of two, is a secret radical liberal or poses a danger to the safety of children felt to some supporters as yet another example of highly qualified Black women having to endure indignities and distortions of their credentials, even as they shatter racial barriers in American society.

Campbell told The Associated Press that 'œthe othering of her, in a sense, like she's against our children,' seemed like a tired political tactic.

'œMy spirit feels it was to bring this Black woman down because she's about to break the glass ceiling that, once broken, opens the door to more.'

Democrats praise President Joe Biden's choice of Jackson as long overdue, a chance to start making the court more reflective of the diverse nation it serves. But they have been slow to bolster the judge's nomination against the unrelenting attacks and instead allowed them to linger.


Over and over during her hearings, Republican Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Josh Hawley of Missouri hammered Jackson on a handful of the many cases she handled as a judge, asking if she regretted having a record that, in their view, is soft on child pornography defendants.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 

No matter how many times Jackson asserted, for example, that the child pornography cases were some of 'œthe most difficult' of her career or tried to explain the particulars of the law, the GOP senators talked over her, past her and pushed onward in their attempt to portray the nominee as they wished.

'œI can only wonder what's your hidden agenda,' asked Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., pointing to one of the judge's earlier writings. 'œIs it to let violent criminals, cop killers and child predators back to the streets? ... Is it your personal hidden agenda to incorporate critical race theory into our legal system?'

These senators insisted their questions were not about race. In fact, Graham opened with a warning that the questioners would be framed as racist. 'œWe're all racists if we ask hard questions. It's not going to fly with us.'

Yet Republicans ignored analysis that shows Jackson's sentencing record on such cases is on track with other judges appointed by both Democrats and Republican presidents, and that in some cases she went beyond recommendations to come down harder on defendants.

'œWhat I regret," Jackson told the senators, "is that in the hearing about my qualifications to be a justice on the Supreme Court, we've spent a lot of time focusing on this small subset of my sentences.'

For many supporters of Jackson, the Republicans' cherry-picking of her record tarnished a momentous occasion.

Nina Turner, a former Ohio state senator who was a prominent surrogate for Sen. Bernie Sanders' 2020 Democratic presidential campaign, criticized Democratic members on the committee for not defending Jackson more vigorously.

'œShe should not have had to endure what she endured,' Turner told the AP. 'œThe Democratic senators should have used their authority and positioning to show the requisite outrage necessary for that moment.'

Overall, during her time on the district court bench, Jackson presided over 14 total cases of child sexual abuse, interstate travel for child sexual abuse and child pornography.

The American Bar Association's standing committee on the federal judiciary said in its survey of some 250 judges, attorneys and academics that words such as 'œbrilliant," 'œbeyond reproach,' 'œfair' were used to describe Jackson, who earned the panel's highest rating.

"They uniformly rejected any accusations of bias,' said Jean Veta of the ABA committee.

In a letter to the Senate committee, Fred Bowman, a University of Missouri law professor and former federal prosecutor, spoke of his dismay at the thought Jackson was somehow 'œsoft' on these crimes. His letter was signed by other experts in the field.

White House deputy press secretary Andrew Bates blasted the Republican line of questioning as an 'œembarrassing conspiracy theory' that 'œhas been conclusively debunked by fact check after fact check.'

But alone before the panel, Jackson had difficulty convincing the Republican senators as she worked to explain the rules judges adhere to and the nuances of the wrenching cases they face. The GOP senators rarely accepted the judge's answers and interjected or just ignored her explanations altogether.

At one point, Jackson simply stopped answering: 'œSenator," she said to Cruz, "I've said what I'm going to say about these cases. No one case can stand in for a judge's entire record.'

By Thursday, as the hearings concluded, Republican leaders in the Senate were using the issue - and her refusal to repeat earlier answers - as justification for opposing her confirmation.

Throughout the four days of testimony, Black women filled many of the seats in the committee room. Those women included some of the leading civil rights figures and members of the Congressional Black Caucus, which ran its own 'œwar room' to back up Jackson's nomination.

LaTosha Brown, cofounder of the group Black Voters Matter, said she had received numerous text messages from Black women who were both outraged by Jackson's treatment from senators and heartened by her clear determination to endure the process.

'œI just got texts that said, '˜Persevere.''

It was a reference to Jackson's own words of advice delivered at the hearing to young people who may have watched what the nominee endured and felt discouraged.

'œBlack people in America," Brown said, "if we don't know anything else, we know what that word means."

___

Mascaro reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Colleen Long, Mary Clare Jalonick and Kevin Freking in Washington contributed to this report.

0 Comments
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
Article Comments
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.