Indiana Senate abandons contentious school curriculum bill

  • Indiana Senate President Pro Tem Rodric Bray, R-Martinsville, left, speaks during a news conference with House Speaker Todd Huston, R-Fishers, on Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2022, at the Indiana Statehouse in Indianapolis. Bray and other Senate leaders say they are hesitant to support a broad tax cut plan being advanced by House Republicans because of worries about a potential economic downturn.

    Indiana Senate President Pro Tem Rodric Bray, R-Martinsville, left, speaks during a news conference with House Speaker Todd Huston, R-Fishers, on Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2022, at the Indiana Statehouse in Indianapolis. Bray and other Senate leaders say they are hesitant to support a broad tax cut plan being advanced by House Republicans because of worries about a potential economic downturn. Associated Press

 
 
Updated 1/14/2022 6:04 PM

INDIANAPOLIS -- The Indiana Senate will not consider contentious Republican-backed legislation that supporters say would have increased parental control over what their kids learn but that teachers and other critics say would have amounted to censorship, a top lawmaker said Friday.

Members of the Republican-led Legislature worked on the bill this week, 'œbut have determined there is no path forward for it and it will not be considered,' Republican Senate President Pro Tem Rodric Bray said in a statement.

 

The legislation would have required all school curricula to be posted online for parental review and would have banned schools' ability to teach concepts such as critical race theory, which has become a catch-all term for the idea that racism is systemic in the nation's institutions and that they function to maintain the dominance of white people in society.

The House is slated to consider a similar bill next week that would require classroom materials to be posted online and vetted by parent review committees, as well as place restrictions on teaching about racism and political topics.

Bray said Tuesday that legislators needed additional time to work on language in the Senate bill sponsored by Republican. Sen. Scott Baldwin of Noblesville, who drew widespread condemnation last week when he said in reference to the legislation that teachers must be 'œimpartial' when discussing Nazism and other political ideologies.

Baldwin later walked back his comments, saying he meant to say he 'œunequivocally' condemns Nazism, fascism and Marxism, and that he agrees that teachers 'œshould condemn those dangerous ideologies.' He was absent from Senate proceedings Wednesday due to COVID-19 exposure, Republican Sen. Jeff Raatz said ahead of the education committee's meeting.

by signing up you agree to our terms of service
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 

Baldwin, who is white, has maintained that his intent was to prevent certain 'œdiscriminatory concepts' from being taught in classrooms.

That would have included prohibiting K-12 schools from requiring a student or employee to 'œengage in training, orientation, or therapy that presents any form of racial or sex stereotyping or blame on the basis of sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, national origin, or political affiliation.' Teachers would also not be allowed to 'œinclude or promote' such concepts as part of their curriculum.

The bill did not explicitly reference critical race theory. Instead, it stated that schools couldn't teach 'œthat any individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, responsibility, or any other form of psychological distress' on account of what Baldwin called 'œthe eight specific divisive concepts' outlined in the bill.

'œI'm glad that Senate Republicans listened to our well-trained and experienced teachers who testified about the damaging consequences of this bill,' Senate Democratic Leader Greg Taylor, of Indianapolis, said in a statement Friday. 'œIndiana's classrooms should be a place where students can learn about facts and history without censorship.'

The House bill with similar language could be voted on by the full House next week. It's one of three 'œeducation matters' bills proposed by conservative lawmakers in both chambers of the General Assembly in the current legislative session.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 

Molly Fishell, a Senate Republican spokeswoman said senators would review the House's similar bill 'œwhen and if" the House passes it.

Republican Rep. Tony Cook of Cicero, who authored the House bill, emphasized that amendments to the legislation adopted on Wednesday in response to teachers' concerns would ensure that educators could still discuss 'œsocial injustices' and that 'œschools can and should teach that Nazism is bad.'

Rep. Ed Delaney, an Indianapolis Democrat who is on the House education committee, said in a statement that members of the House continue to work on that bill, 'œbut should agree there is no path forward and bury it.'

___

Casey Smith is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Follow Smith on Twitter.

0 Comments
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
Article Comments
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.