Diminishing benefits is unconstitutional
I have recently emailed several Illinois lawmakers reminding them that legislators are expected to honor their oath of office, uphold the state and U.S. constitutions, and safeguard legal and moral commitments. They are not voted into office to renegotiate contracts, thereby impairing constitutional obligations. Creating and passing any bill that diminishes “promised” benefits, such as COLA that is in place for retired and current teachers, is a breach of contract and trust.
Why was the Nekritz/Biss HB 6258 proposal developed without any input from those affected? Why isn’t the retirement system for judges included under this bill?
Rebecca E. Pollacci
Arlington Heights
Article Comments
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.
If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the "flag" link in the lower-right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.