Get to the truth in traffic camera debate

Last week your paper criticized the "tactics and process" used as the Senate addresses red-light camera reform. Although you are appalled that a legally obtained video of Senator Dan Duffy's red-light camera violation was played in a committee, this act was a direct response to Duffy's legislation to ban these public safety tools.

This video was displayed as evidence in a committee hearing to address Duffy's claim that he was unfairly penalized by rigged cameras.

With great fanfare and self-promotion, Senator Duffy told your paper that he crafted his legislation because he received an unwarranted ticket. In that Feb. 16 article, Duffy "said he stopped behind the line and inched forward before making a turn because a utility box obstructed his view."

If true, there was indeed a need for a comprehensive overhaul to the law. The ability to confirm his story was recorded. Unfortunately, the video and Senator Duffy's memory are in conflict.

This evidence proved that Senator Duffy, in fact, did not stop. His view was not obstructed by a utility box. And, he did not inch forward. Maybe this evidence in a legislative debate caused Senator Duffy discomfort, but the video highlights what many who appeal their violations discover; their actions were unsafe and against traffic laws.

The Daily Herald also implied that camera company representatives wrote the bill I sponsored. I did host a meeting that included camera company representatives. But legislators and representatives of the city of Chicago - the first community to use the camera technology - also attended. At that meeting, legislators added provisions to the bill over the strong objections of camera companies.

Legislators wrote the law, period. But don't just take my word for it; ask Senator Duffy who also attended the meeting. Perhaps he will tell you the truth.

John J. Cullerton

Illinois Senate President

Chicago