Here's a different take on the candidates

This is in response to a letter written by Dolores Yurkowski on Feb. 25.

She described Rubio as too slick (I have to admit, he's a good-looking guy. Very polished, great life story). Cruz has questionable honesty (Again, huh? I guess Democrats don't like honesty). Carson, too meek and mild (A wonderful human being. Again, I guess Democrats only like people who have a questionable background). Donald Trump, too rich (and the Clinton's aren't?) and wife is too beautiful (And what's wrong with that?) (Can you imagine a Republican saying that about a Democrat who is running for office? The press would crucify that person).

And that brings us to Sanders, a professed socialist. Every young supporter I saw interviewed had no clue what a socialist is. All they know is he's offering free stuff. True socialism has never worked. And last but not least, Hillary Clinton. A professed progressive (another word for socialist), a habitual untruth teller, corrupt, runs a money laundering scheme called the Clinton Foundation (collects millions of dollars from foreign governments funneled through Canada), (and a majority of likely Democratic voters consider her untrustworthy but feel compelled to vote for her anyway), and has no notable accomplishments as a senator or secretary of state (or anywhere else for that matter).

She is under investigation by multiple federal agencies. Anyone else not named Clinton would have been indicted by now.

Oh yes, there is one thing she will be remembered for. She lied and four brave Americans died. Those families are still waiting to hear from her why their husbands, fathers and sons died.

Hillary is all about Hillary.

Al Haak

Palatine