Clinton did not deserve endorsement

Your editorial staff is nothing more than another faction of the liberal mainstream media that America no longer subscribes to. Your support and rationale behind an endorsement of Hillary Clinton makes no sense and only speaks about personalities instead of substantive differences in policies and ideologies between the candidates.

Hillary Clinton is a career politician who has damaged this country and has not achieved anything for America. She and her husband are corrupt. She has never run a business. She is weakly regarded by foreign diplomats. She cost four people their lives in Benghazi, has railroaded her husband's abuse victims, takes money from Foreign countries that enslave women and cut off LGBTQ person's heads, and will do nothing to move this country forward.

You guys are no different from The Washington Post or New York Times; left-leaning always, biased and brainwashing the public. You are status quo writers and thinkers.

Furthermore, your endorsement of Clinton does not align with H.C. Paddock's aim "To Fear God, tell the truth and make money." Clinton's track record is not compliant with this mission, and I believe Mr. Paddock is rolling in his grave and would not allow you to publish the paper's support of Clinton, if he were alive today.

Donald Trump, while having a bold, candid, and passionate personality; would try something different and is exactly the type of change agent this country and its future needs.

Kevin Lowe

Gurnee