No mention of abortion
I find it interesting that the Herald’s editorial endorsement for Harris-Walz did not include any mention of Abortion. It’s quite apparent published articles on abortion are framed as a symbolic/political issue more than on its effects on maternal health, families and health care providers. Why has this happened? Because many more government and politics journalists are employed versus health-care focused journalists. Why then wasn’t it worth mentioning your view on Harris-Walz position on abortion? One of the top issues of this election?
Dan Prezell
Mundelein
Article Comments
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.
If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the "flag" link in the lower-right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.