Yes to civility – but all around

I agree wholeheartedly with Dan Schuchardt’s point in the May 31 “Your Views” column that less name-calling would make for better politics. Ironically, he seemed to be mostly concerned about name calling against Donald Trump, who himself is worst offender in this regard by far.

I also think the writer overstated his case. Contrary to his claim, there are legitimate analogies to be made between Trump and Hitler. For starters, there are his fomenting of the Capitol rebellion to overturn a legitimate election and his repeated use of language that echoes Hitler’s. Trump’s open espousal of absolute presidential power and immunity, his affinity for dictatorial leaders, his sympatico with white supremacists and antisemites, his promise, if elected, to appoint only yes men to positions of influence and to use the government as a tool to go after rivals are good examples. If you’re concerned that Trump stacked the Supreme Court during his last term, just wait until you see his VP, cabinet and advisor picks if reelected. It’s a safe bet there won’t be anyone to draw the line, as Mike Pence did in 2020, the next time Trump wants to scuttle the Constitution to hold onto power.

Schuchardt’s praise of Trump’s business acumen was also a bit off the mark. Had he not been born with a silver spoon, it’s doubtful Trump would have come to enjoy the wealth and status he now has. Even with all he inherited, one loses count of the bankruptcies, lawsuits from unpaid vendors and business failures over the years.

So, yes to more civility in politics, but no to Mr. Trump, who is probably the least civil person in politics ever.

Bob Dohn

Hoffman Estates