More analysis needed on transit fares

In New York City, the Transit Authority is trending toward 32% of revenue coming from fares in 2026. For us here in Chicago the number is 25%. In Washington, D.C., it’s 22% currently. In Cleveland (many factors are different from NITA) the number is 11.5% currently.

Marni Pyke’s recent story indicates that the distribution of funds from each pot of money in the new transportation reorganization is not predetermined — it’s somewhat fluid. I wonder how that distribution will shake out, say, a year from now.

Studies have reported that the public wants motor-fuel tax revenue and road funds to be used for roads and highways only. That’s not going to happen here. However, I and others could hope and lobby for an increase in the percentage of transit spending that comes from the fare box.

If they try to drive up fares, ridership drops, but by how much? I keep trying to lobby them for a study or survey showing elasticity of demand. We’re subsidizing lower income people’s transportation, but what are the numbers? Is there a limit to our willingness to offer transit welfare?

It looks like our transit officials are spending many millions with no analysis or specific knowledge of need — just the balance of political power. 

Dan Brown

Des Plaine