No mention of abortion

I find it interesting that the Herald’s editorial endorsement for Harris-Walz did not include any mention of Abortion. It’s quite apparent published articles on abortion are framed as a symbolic/political issue more than on its effects on maternal health, families and health care providers. Why has this happened? Because many more government and politics journalists are employed versus health-care focused journalists. Why then wasn’t it worth mentioning your view on Harris-Walz position on abortion? One of the top issues of this election?

Dan Prezell

Mundelein