Jurors perform a civic duty

It is disheartening to read disparaging comments directed toward the jury that served in the recent New York state case involving a very public figure. Sitting on a jury is a civic duty that ultimately improves justice for all of us and we are fortunate to live in a country that allows jury trials by our peers.

Some people wrongly believe that if they give up one civic duty, such as registering to vote, they would avoid another civic duty, such as being called for jury pool. Most people who respond to a jury pool call and get selected to sit on a jury, are thoughtful, serious people who are interested in deciding a law justly. These people give up their normal routine, perhaps having to cancel or adjust meetings, events or arranging family care. They commit to navigating transportation in order to arrive at the court on time, to stay until released at the end of the day, and for the term of the trial. Most want to see justice done.

Most laws are enacted to address identified issues that are unjust or dangerous. Most likely the New York state law involved in this case is not new and has been used many times before for other defendants. The difference in this case is that the defendant found guilty is a vocal public figure with access to public media who is willing to disparage the courts, judge and jury. This type of behavior is dangerous for our system of justice. Additionally, as with any other defendant, appeal is available.

Just as those who served in the military are thanked for their service, those who disrupt their lives to fulfill a civic responsibility by responding and committing to serve on a jury, should also be allowed to peacefully return to their lives and all of us should be thankful for their service.

Laura Davis

Inverness