Follow evidence to see if there was fraud

Reading Marc Munroe Dion's comments on Tuesday, Dec. 15, he is once again short on facts, logic or common sense. His column did come across as blind to evidence, gloating and angry.

I want to make a clear distinction between evidence and proof. To date, we have seen no proof of significant voter irregularities. There has been a substantial amount of evidence submitted.

The most significant being the hundreds of sworn affidavits of people that witnessed actions not in accordance with standard practices. These are people that saw things with their own eyes, unlike Mr. Dion, and under penalty of perjury (possible jail time), felt strongly enough to go on the record with their concerns.

Not 10, not 50, but hundreds of witnesses across many states. There is evidence of the particular voting machines in these toss-up states being compromised in several different ways. There are videos of questionable actives. The polls indicate that somewhere between 30% and 60% of the population feels that voting irregularities happened in large numbers.

Instead of ignoring the evidence, I would think we would want to get it all out and prove to those questioning the results of this election, that everything was done properly. That's what I want. There were around 70 million votes for the president, those voters just want our elections to be accurate.

Tom Horstman

Arlington Heights