Promising everything, delivering nothing

I find it interesting that in virtually all the political ads for Hillary Clinton, there is no mention of any of her accomplishments.

Could it be that in all those years as first lady, senator from New York, and secretary of state that she had no accomplishments worth mentioning?

Her tenure as secretary of state left much to be desired. The failed non-reset with Russia, the disaster at Ben Ghazi, the poorly planned and executed fiasco in Libya, the nonexistent red line in Syria.

Not to mention the email and negligent handling of classified information. Surely we wouldn't want any of these mistakes repeated by a President. And the majority of her political ads are personal attacks against her opponent.

Of course she learned this from Barack Obama, who used this tactic successfully in every election he was ever in. Both of them are experts in promising everything and producing nothing.

Remember all those promises? And now more of the same free stuff. Somehow they fail to mention that their money tree managed to double the national debt in 8 years.

Watch out millennials, you will be paying dearly down the road for all this free stuff.

It seems that progressives like to categorize and assign names to everything. In that case, if the only reason you are voting for a person to be president is because they are a woman, then you are sexist.

Do we really need another "first"? Didn't we learn from the mistakes of the last one?

Daryl G. Pratt

Arlington Heights