Annual exploration of Beaujolais worth the trip
The third Thursday in November means the return of one of wine’s most famous marketing gimmicks: Beaujolais nouveau.
We used to see signs in restaurants and wine stores proclaiming “Le Beaujolais nouveau est arrive!” almost as a harbinger of cold weather and the holidays. Nouveau’s luster has faded, thanks to rising prices and the cynicism of wine purists who feel Beaujolais should be above all that. But I still like it.
I have a fondness for nouveau because it celebrates the harvest just completed, and it arrives a week before our own national harvest celebration of Thanksgiving. It’s fun, fruity and simple. I’m happy to quaff a bottle or two each November. I also like nouveau because it gives me a reason to concentrate on Beaujolais as a wine region and on the variety of wines it offers.
If your impression of Beaujolais has been formed entirely from your annual indulgence in, or avoidance of, nouveau, you owe it to yourself to explore the region more thoroughly.
Beaujolais is the southernmost part of Burgundy, near Lyon. The wines are almost exclusively red, from the Gamay grape. (Beaujolais blanc, made from Chardonnay, is rare and quite tasty.) Gamay makes a light-bodied wine, with none of the pedigree or seriousness of cabernet sauvignon or pinot noir and nowhere near the heft of syrah. Beaujolais isn’t a “road to Damascus” wine that will change your life. It can be an ideal “bistro wine,” a house red suitable for sipping by itself or for accompanying a variety of foods, from charcuterie to steak. It can even benefit from a slight chill.
Like most French wine regions, Beaujolais has its hierarchy, though here the status is easier to understand than in most areas. The basic wines are labeled Beaujolais and Beaujolais-Villages. The better wines, called cru, are labeled for the various small towns in the region, and each has its own subtle terroir. These are attractive-sounding towns such as Morgon, Moulin-a-Vent, Brouilly, Regnie, Fleurie, Julienas, Chenas and the mellifluous Chiroubles. While good Beaujolais should feature flavors of cherries and a hint of smoky mushrooms, each of the crus adds its own accent.
If you read the winestream media, you’ve probably seen that Beaujolais is in crisis: The success of nouveau has overshadowed the region’s other wines and convinced consumers that Beaujolais is a once-a-year quaff. That misperception is reflected in the poor availability of Beaujolais wines in the market; there are plenty in the distribution system, because importers and sommeliers like them, but they can be scarce at retail.
Most stores will have only a few wines from a single producer: Georges Duboeuf. Duboeuf made nouveau a success and built his brand into the region’s largest producer. There’s nothing wrong with his wines, despite what the wine geeks say, but taste a few and you might notice a commercial quality and a sameness that hints of winemaking indoors rather than in the vineyard. For a true exploration of Beaujolais, one must seek out wines by small, family-owned producers.
Another reason to explore Beaujolais is that you can really taste the vintage variation in these wines. Three vintages are available now: 2008, 2009 and 2010. In my recent tastings, I found the 2010s to be the most lively and vibrant, reveling in their youth. (Unfortunately, they are just coming onto the market, so they’re still fairly hard to find.)
My most interesting tasting compared the 2008 and 2009 vintages of the Chenas from Domaine Pascal Aufranc. The vintage difference was visible in the glass: The 2009, from the riper harvest, was noticeably darker. We’re conditioned to think a dark wine is a better wine, but in this case I disagree. The 2008 was light in color and body but lively in its fruit and acidity, while the 2009 smelled and tasted a bit pruney and overripe, as if the grapes had hung on the vine a bit too long. I preferred the ‘08, but I can understand why others might prefer the bigger wine.
That’s what the fun is all about.
Ÿ Dave McIntyre blogs at dmwineline.com; follow him on Twitter @dmwine
Exploring Beaujolais
The fun in exploring cru Beaujolais lies in looking first for small importers that represent family wineries. Once you find one you like, try different wines from various appellations within Beaujolais. These recommendations are starting points, but if you cant find a particular wine, look for another from the same producer or importer, including another vintage.
Domaine Pral Morgon Les Charmes 2010
Two and a half stars
Beaujolais, France, $22
This wine is delightfully lively with cherry, raspberry and smoke, like a cold autumn evening. It is still quite young and lean, and it might flesh out with a few more months in bottle. But it is lithe and enticing right now.
Daniel Bouland Chiroubles 2010
Two and a half stars
Beaujolais, France, $24
It twists and turns across the palate with cherries, mushrooms, a hint of smoke from the air and a mineral grip from the soil.
Manoir du Carra Fleurie 2009
Two stars
Beaujolais, France, $25
From a producer with 50 vineyard plots throughout Beaujolais, this Fleurie is produced from fruit grown on vines averaging 50 years of age. It offers a nice hint of smoke and mineral, with a seductive velvety texture and impressive finish.
Domaine du Pavillon de Chavannes Cote de Brouilly Cuvee des Ambassades 2010
Two stars
Beaujolais, France, $21
This has a bit more structure and heft than many cru Beaujolais, which is in part a characteristic of Cote de Brouilly. The balance of fruit, earth and sky (that hint of autum smoke) is impeccable.
Thibault Liger-Belair Moulin a Vent Viellies Vignes 2009
Two stars
Beaujolais, France, $25
Lively and delicate, it has nice floral notes and an enticing, lingering finish. This producer also makes two single-vineyard wines from Moulin-a-Vent that are worth exploring.
Domaine Pascal Aufranc Chenas Vieilles Vignes 2008
Two stars
Beaujolais, France, $15
Both the 2008 and 2009 are available right now, and they provide an excellent chance to compare vintage variation. The 2008 is light and true to the Beaujolais type, while the 2009 is riper and bigger in texture and flavor. My preference is for the 2008, but theres enough 2009 to go around for those who disagree.
— Dave McIntyre