Radon testing was inadequate
After failed attempts to District 95 regarding the invalid 2009 radon test results, a formal request was made to remove the invalid District 95 2009 radon results from their site.
District 95 defends the invalid radon results stating “It should be noted that radon testing — and in fact, IAQ testing in general — are recommended by the EPA but are NOT required by any agency.” Not true for District 95, as the board approved the IAQ Management Plan wherein all IAQ testing including radon testing following IEMA WILL be performed.
We’ve been scammed. Radon is the second leading cause for lung cancer. We believed our schools were tested for radon following IEMA, but they weren’t. In Spring 2011, under a grant, one facility was to be tested but just days before the testing began, the only trained and certified employee was released. He was about to place 74 canisters where only 3 were used in 2009. The cost was $15.
The testing still has not been performed. At the last COW meeting, the board heard from the administration that they are continuing to assess the 2009 radon results, work on certification, perform a cost-benefit analysis and then will determine if testing will be done.
Unacceptable.
No more stalling! Remove the invalid 2009 radon results; perform radon testing in all schools following IEMA. Finally, the board should be censured for lack of oversight. The superintendent, facilities director and communications director should be censured for their intentional pattern of deception as it pertains to the management of the facilities.
Carolyn A. Fitzgerald
Hawthorn Woods