Red light cameras all about the buck

Thank you for your recent article on public safety. Like you, I do not condone speeding or other traffic violations that endanger the public. However, the reason for the increase in fines, as well as the cameras at intersections, is obvious for all to see. It's about money.

A perfect example is what occurred at the stoplight at Route 31 and Boncosky recently. My husband and I stopped for the light when it turned yellow. But another car, some way back, continue on and went through the intersection as it was fully red. No camera flash. But 10 seconds later, a right-hand turner onto Boncosky did not come to a complete stop. The camera did snap a picture of that vehicle. Which was more of a danger to the public?

Another example happened this morning. As I slowed down for a yellow light while traveling south on Route 31, a car next to me started to slow down as well but misjudged the distance. He tried braking but this caused the car to start to spin. Because the individual did not want to be caught by the camera, he gunned his car to get through. Had the camera not been installed there, I believe he would have gone easily through the intersection without endangering himself or the public. I don't think this would have happened had he not been afraid of what the camera might decide.

It's shameful the way our elected representatives are using these means to cover their budget shortfalls. Is there any way to find out if anyone who can impact this injustice is up for re-election in November and what their views are?

Gerry Kneisel

West Dundee