The real rights in health care debate

Americans across the nation watched intensely as Congress debated and ultimately passed the onerous health care "reform" bill. One main point of contention is the idea that health care is a "right." This is nothing short of socialistic propaganda.

In America we understand that our rights come from God, not government.

To see the difference in government-mandated health care and real rights, look at how they are exercised. Historically, American citizens have been free to exercise - or not to exercise - their real, constitutionally protected rights as they see fit. The government does not compel citizens to attend church in the name of religious freedom. The government does not compel citizens to own a gun in the name of the Second Amendment. And the government does not force citizens to engage in the political process in the name of free speech. In contrast, our "progressive" friends are eager to compel every American using the heavy hand of government to exercise their so-called right to health care.

What is really at issue is whether citizens have a right to taxpayer-funded health care. What other cherished American right has ever required that we diminish another's liberty?

Does the right to free speech require newspaper owners to print every op-ed and editorial? Does the right to bear arms require the government to arm its citizenry? Does the freedom of religion require government-funding of churches, mosques and synagogues? Why then, does this right to health care require the government to take from some to give to others? When in the history of our country have we had to secure a right by trampling on the liberties of others?

Yet this is what is happening. And it will be made possible by taking from citizens "according to their ability" and giving to others "according to their needs." Karl Marx would be proud.

David E. Smith

Executive Director

Illinois Family Institute

Tinley Park