advertisement

Ex-Mayor Mueller on Hainesville police issue

The Hainesville Police issue needs some clarification. Mayor Soto is comparing apples and oranges with her cost comparison. The cost of a new police building should be a capital expense and not be included in the police budget. While the building will increase the village budget, it should not be in the police budget.

If one compares the three options, you will find that all three operating costs are so close that cost shouldn't be considered.

Right now, the police are operating out of the village hall as are many other small police departments. However, does Hainesville need a $1.3 million dollar police building? There is room on the property to expand the public works building and keep the police on the property. When I was mayor, I reviewed this concept with our building official and it appeared a viable option.

When we opted to start our own police department, (former) Chief Ron Roth and I explained to each candidate that this was going to be a startup department and there weren't any initial benefits. Each officer indicated he was happy to be a part of it and was proud to be a Hainesville Police officer. And all are now committed to their positions and to our residents.

Now, it needs to be said that after the formation of the department, the village joined (Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund) and full-time officers now participate in that. In addition, full-time officers get a $150 monthly stipend in lieu of benefits not yet provided.

Lastly, where is the transparency? Officials recently held a special board meeting and although did do the required legal posting, why were residents not notified via CTY (telephone community alert system) as has been done for less important issues?