Why shun religion in public debate?
Religious beliefs are no longer acceptable in public discourse or debate. Ms. California received a major societal smackdown for citing religious beliefs as her basis for not supporting gay marriage.
Judith Carlson (Fence Post April 24) applauds Mr. Maril for not citing his religious beliefs in the debate. A child's teacher dared not utter the words Good Friday when asked about the holiday, choosing rather to simply describe it as a day that some people celebrate.
The core of the debate lies not in public discourse, but in the hearts and minds of individuals, whether they believe in God or not. If you don't believe in God, then man is your highest intelligence and authority. Only man and secular institutions are options for solving problems.
Your beliefs are guided by the opinions of experts, the media, and by those with power. You make moral decisions based upon how you and your friends currently feel, and what works best for you. By the prominence of their positions, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and members of the United Nations are some of the most powerful beings in your universe.
If you believe in God, then you admit that a higher power, intelligence, and moral authority exist. The knowledge of God does not limit the advancement of man, but rather empowers us for greater achievement by providing timeless insight into the nature of man and creation. You don't have to check your mind at the door to believe in God. In fact, if you thoroughly examine the evidence you may find it takes more faith not to believe.
Moral discourse without religion is playing the game of life without a rule book. We can either subscribe to the belief that with God, all things are possible; or without God, all things are permissible.
Eric Carver
Palatine