Elgin shows commitment to restoring single-family homes
Elgin city leaders not long ago signed off on a last-minute grant that probably raised eyebrows if viewed from afar.
Councilmen agreed to give the owners of a four-unit condominium building at 269-275 DuPage St. $50,000 for emergency repairs to an unstable foundation that caused floors to sag and walls to crack.
In turn, the owners promised to sue the contractor who did the repairs in the first place and give whatever they won back to the city.
Who is right, wrong and owes money in the end eventually will be decided in court, but one thing is clear: the council's $50,000 grant highlights the city's commitment to its apartment "deconversion" program.
Since 1995, the city of Elgin has offered grants and other incentives for property owners and builders to restore single-family homes or condos to their original state after they'd been carved up over time into two or more apartments that usually resulted in building code violations.
The end result of removing apartments is fewer people living in each building, less noise, more available parking and new owners who have a greater stake in their neighborhood.
"It's really been a significant help to our neighborhood," said Dan Miller, past president of the Gifford Park Association who also lobbied city leaders in the 1990s to begin a deconversion program. "It's an absolute godsend for us."
Years of success
In 13 years, Elgin's program has eliminated 312 apartments from the city, an average of about 23 per year.
The city has doled out $6.8 million since the program started. Funding comes from riverboat casino revenues.
Elgin's program is modeled after Aurora's "Reconversion" program, which started in 1994.
Through 2007, Aurora handed out a total $4.5 million to eliminate 205 units, an average of nearly 16 a year.
Gwenn San Filippo, a planner in Aurora's
Neighborhood Redevelopment Department, said most of the grants were issued so a two-flat with an exterior stairway and second-floor entrance could be converted back to a single-family home.
Big investment
Compared to Elgin's commitment so far to the deconversion program, the emergency $50,000 grant is a drop in the bucket.
So how do deconversions apply to this condominium building?
Years ago, Elgin leaders doled out more than $200,000 in incentives for the 12-unit building to be reduced to four owner-occupied units.
During the project, a firm installed steel support posts in the basement crawlspace.
But city inspectors missed this area before the building was sold, and the problem got progressively worse.
City lawyers said Elgin was not legally obligated to help in this case.
Councilmen Dave Kaptain and Juan Figueroa voted against the grant.
Kaptain said he supports the deconversion program but worried the move would set a bad precedent.
"Everybody signed off on the (project)," Kaptain said. "Where does our obligation end?"
But other council members and residents believe the emergency grant merely protects the city's initial investment to help clean up a problem property.
Councilman Mike Powers said the building could become uninhabitable if the problem was not fixed. If that happened, the property could revert to being a blight on the neighborhood and the people would be clamoring for the city to step in and do something.
"Since we seemed to have goofed up in the first time around, it's the right thing to do," he said. "To not repair it would be foolish. It would be a waste of our initial $200,000."
Miller, who lives in the neighborhood, said he is pleased the grant will ensure the building remains occupied by young professionals.
"The city was morally obligated to do that," Miller said.
So far this year, 13 deconversion projects in Elgin have received funding.
Another four are awaiting funding because casino revenues are down in Elgin as well as across the state.
But don't expect the program to slow - it's one of the city council's top priorities.
"It completely changes the dynamics of a neighborhood," said Sue Olafson, city spokeswoman. "We are very committed to the program simply because it's a quality of life issue."