Shopping center plan gets final approval from Mundelein board
Although the matter's still tied up in court, a controversial plan for a new shopping center in Mundelein received final approval from the village board Monday night.
Months of board discussions culminated with two 4-1 votes that allow the Mundelein Town Center proposal to proceed on Route 60 north of Route 176.
A Wal-Mart Supercenter, an Office Max, a Menards and about 50 other stores and restaurants are planned for the 600,000-square-foot center.
As has been the case on previous votes regarding the development, Terri Voss was the only trustee who voted against the final plan for the development and the final subdivision plan. Trustees Ed Sullivan, Jim Nutschnig, Ray Semple and Chip Cancelli favored the proposals, while Trustee Jay Schedler was absent.
The proposal has been criticized by residents of the Ivanhoe neighborhood, a collection of upscale homes in an area of unincorporated Lake County abutting the proposed shopping center site. They've complained about the proposed aesthetics of the development and the quality of some stores, particularly the Wal-Mart.
They've also sued various village officials over the plan, alleging objectors were not properly able to cross-examine witnesses, present evidence or offer rebuttals during plan commission discussions held in May 2007.
Unlike previous board meetings featuring Town Center discussions, few of the critics were in the audience Monday and none rose to object to the proposal. Their attorney was not present either, whereas he had been at past meetings and often spoke against the Town Center proposal.
Before the board voted, Voss proposed an amendment that would allow the village to order the demolition of any large store in the center that remains vacant for a long period of time. She had few specifics, however.
Mayor Kenneth H. Kessler and Trustee Ed Sullivan opposed the concept and it never was voted upon.
"Just because (a building) is vacant doesn't mean we can go in and bulldoze the place," Kessler said.
Village attorney Charles Marino also questioned the constitutionality of such a regulation.
After the board's vote, Chuck Byrum, attorney for the Rubloff Development Group, the company spearheading the Town Center plan, said he was pleased with the panel's decision and added that he expects to win the lawsuit.
Byrum declined to comment on the lawsuit or to say whether construction will be delayed until after the legal battle is settled.