Opposing a wrong war isn't unpatriotic

In response to Paul Bischoff's letter to the editor ("Can't back troops while opposing war") I must respond. Since Mr. Bischoff thinks that he has the true definition of patriotism I was hoping that he or anyone who supports his assertions would be able to answer several questions that I have.

How is sending troops into a war based on half truths, cherry-picked intelligence and outright lies considered to be supporting our troops? How is sending troops into battle in numbers inadequate to secure the peace, supporting our troops? How is failing to adequately supply our troops with the body armor and equipment that they need, supporting our troops?

How is cutting veterans' benefits supporting our troops? How is saying "Bring it on" from the comfort and safety of the White House, supporting our troops? How is allowing our troops to live in virtual squalor while recuperating from injuries sustained in a war of choice considered to be supporting our troops?

How is failing to plan for the reconstruction of a country that our troops are occupying considered to be supporting our troops? How is labeling those who fight and die for our country but disagree with the policy of the current administration as "phony soldiers," supporting our troops?

How is either defending or enabling anyone who would do any of the above, considered to be supporting our troops?

Until they are able to answer these questions, I say that they are not fit to question anyone else's motivations or patriotism.

Michael M. Zable

Batavia