Do accurate reports on global warming

It was so nice to see Al Gore's beaming face taking up most of your Saturday Oct. 13 front page. The Nobel Peace Prize selection committee has a history of following an anti-American, liberal agenda and you played right into their hands. Jimmy Carter's selection was another prime example.

The global warming controversy has become a political, not a scientific, issue. Perhaps all reporting on the subject should be relegated to the editorial page. If you wanted to report the news fairly, how about printing (right next to the Nobel article) the recent report out of London regarding the High Court judge who ruled that Gore's "Inconvenient Truth" contained nine assertions that are "not supported by current mainstream scientific consensus."

Or perhaps you could do a feature on the recent book, "Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years", which debunks the Gore camp's "Convenient Lies." The book presents well-sourced, detailed data collected by scientists working independently, demonstrating the 1,500-year cycle that was discovered in the early 1980s and confirmed by measurements in tree rings (living, preserved and fossilized), pollen, coral, glaciers, boreholes, stalagmites, tree lines and sea sediments.

Paul Radzicki

Naperville