What will anti-Clinton crowd think of next?

I find the ineptitude of the anti-Clinton crowd hilarious. Any competent group would have found evidence of all the nasty things she has been accused of a long time ago; Benghazi, emails, foundation, etc. So, my conclusion is that either they are simply incompetent or there is no evidence. I doubt their incompetence, so I conclude that there really isn't any evidence.

Of course, this serves their purpose nicely. You see, if someone accuses you of something that you didn't do, there is no evidence! Without evidence, how can you prove that you didn't do it? Unfortunately, the accuser can always claim that "they just haven't found the evidence - yet."

And so it goes, year after year, we are subjected to the "we haven't found the evidence - yet" idea. We see the results of this process everywhere; newspapers, TV, internet and in our personal conversations. It may be entertaining but the accusations are simply accusations.

Like it or not - there is no evidence. It's simply a list of unfounded accusations. Now, this is something that the anti-Clinton crowd is really good at. What will they think of next?

John S. Strauss

Campton Hills