Breaking News Bar
posted: 6/9/2014 5:01 AM

Problems with coal outweigh any benefits

hello
Success - Article sent! close
 

In a sluggish economic recovery, the EPA's new carbon rules aimed at eliminating coal as an energy source are a welcome relief. According to a 2010 Harvard study, "Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal," published in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, the cumulative costs from pollutants associated with coal combustion add 27 cents to the cost of a kilowatt-hour of energy, costing the United States over a half-trillion dollars a year, far in excess of what coal contributes economically.

A 2011 study, "Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy," in the American Economic Review states that the external costs of burning coal are 2.2 times more costly to the U.S. economy than any economic benefits derived from coal.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

Coal is a 19th century energy source, requiring massive subsidies for its existence, and burning coal for 40 percent of our energy is economically unfeasible.

Jim Arneberg

Hoffman Estates

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here