Breaking News Bar
posted: 5/9/2014 1:01 AM

Editorial: Lombard did the right thing, but needs a policy

hello
Success - Article sent! close
  • Hopefully, with some good planning, the focus for next year's Lilac Time festival will be more on the lilacs.

      Hopefully, with some good planning, the focus for next year's Lilac Time festival will be more on the lilacs.

 
The Daily Herald Editorial Board

One of the surest signs of spring for 85 years in the suburbs has been Lilac Time, Lombard's annual festival celebrating the beauty of the lilacs that blanket Lilacia Park.

But this year, the festival was soured by controversy -- one that could have been avoided with some forethought.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

As bucolic as Lilacia Park is in the springtime, don't confuse Lombard with Mayberry, where the biggest disagreements seemed to center on who puts up the best pickles for the county fair.

Politics this year put one of the highlights of Lilac Time -- the coronation of the Lilac Queen and her court -- in the cross hairs.

Two days before the queen and court were to be announced, a pair of trustees questioned why one of the five princesses -- the daughter of a village trustee -- would get a $1,000 scholarship. The scholarships, given annually to the princesses, have been funded by the village's hotel/motel tax for 14 years.

The Lombard Junior Women's Club sponsors the Princess competition. Penny Chanez, the president of the club, told Daily Herald staff writer Jessica Cilella that 20 to 30 young women who range in age from 16 to 21 apply each year to compete. They are judged based on their poise and grace and answers to interview questions posed by people who live outside of the community. The contestants' last names are not disclosed to the judges.

Trustees Peter Breen and Laura Fitzpatrick said they felt it would be a conflict of interest if 17-year-old Morgan Fugiel, daughter of Trustee Mike Fugiel, were to receive a scholarship. Breen cited the need for governmental transparency.

Fitzpatrick noted that the village board decided less than two years ago that the village would not buy food from Village President Keith Giagnorio's pizzeria. "I feel it is morally wrong to accept personal gain from the village," she said before the board voted 4-2 to award the scholarship to Morgan.

Giagnorio, who says he is angry over this episode, pledges to have the board take a look at its policies.

"I can't help but think what Morgan Fugiel is thinking, what she's gone through," the mayor said. "I have a daughter. I can only imagine. I am embarrassed for that."

That's understandable. It needn't have come to this, but Breen and Fitzpatrick do have a point.

In the same way that good fences make good neighbors, well thought-out policies take some of the politics out of government. In the absence of policy, this sort of thing occurs. In this case, the village board did the only honorable thing in refusing to withhold Morgan's scholarship. She should not be made a political scapegoat.

But the village board -- and boards long before this one -- needs to have a set of rules in place to deal with potential conflicts of interest such as this. Giagnorio obviously recognizes this, noting both the problem in appearance -- justified or not -- when giving a $1,000 scholarship award to the daughter of a village trustee and the need to revisit the policy that allows it.

He's also right that it was unfortunate to bring this up two days before the start of an event that's a highlight of the spring not just for Lombard but for the entire region. The timing was terrible. But the issue is legitimate and needs to be addressed.

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.