Breaking News Bar
posted: 1/6/2014 5:00 AM

Madigan's summary of pension law worthless

hello
Success - Article sent! close
 

The members of the Illinois General Assembly were allowed by the leadership less than a full day to read and understand the new 325-page pension law. The law is now available online and so jam-packed with legalese that it seems almost unreadable. It is likely, then, that members of the assembly had to rely on their leaders for a clear and accurate summary of the law.

The Chicago Tribune of Dec. 4 reported that when Michael Madigan responded to a lawmaker's question during debate on the bill, he summarized what considerations employees are getting in return for their pension reductions. One of his "considerations" was "the retirement system could go to the Illinois Supreme Court if lawmakers failed to make required payments."

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

It is interesting that the General Assembly felt a need to make it part of the law that the retirement system would have to use precious resources to fight through the courts if the lawmakers violated the law. It is certainly a matter of record, however, that for years the lawmakers didn't follow the law by underfunding the pensions.

What was missing from Madigan's summary of that part of the law was the last line of the written summaries: "This provision, however, can be altered or repealed by the General Assembly in the future." What kind of consideration is that? It seems only logical that in the future when the lawmakers decide not to "make the required payments" they will simply repeal the provision giving the retirement system no way to fight for the law. It is also interesting that no one during the debate challenged him on the worthlessness of the "consideration." Apparently they hadn't read the law or been given the short summary that is available now to all of us.

Bill Bailey

Schaumburg

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here