Breaking News Bar
updated: 5/21/2013 10:58 PM

Analysis: Pension cuts might save less than thought

hello
Success - Article sent! close
  • Lawmakers would like to come to a pensions compromise before the end of the month.

       Lawmakers would like to come to a pensions compromise before the end of the month.
    Gilbert R. Boucher | Staff Photographer

  • Darlene Senger

      Darlene Senger

  • Elaine Nekritz

      Elaine Nekritz

 
 

SPRINGFIELD -- Number crunchers at the Illinois pension funds say a union-backed plan to cut public employee benefits might not save the cash-strapped state as much money as previously believed.

State Reps. Elaine Nekritz of Northbrook and Darlene Senger of Naperville told reporters Tuesday that legislation approved by the Illinois Senate could provide as little as $5 billion in immediate savings off the state's $100 billion in pension debt. The proposal, which would give employees and retirees a choice between pension benefit cuts or other sacrifices, had been predicted to save around $10 billion.

Order Reprint Print Article
 
Interested in reusing this article?
Custom reprints are a powerful and strategic way to share your article with customers, employees and prospects.
The YGS Group provides digital and printed reprint services for Daily Herald. Complete the form to the right and a reprint consultant will contact you to discuss how you can reuse this article.
Need more information about reprints? Visit our Reprints Section for more details.

Contact information ( * required )

Success - request sent close

"We wanted to get the math out there," Nekritz said of the analysis by the state's four public pension systems.

The Senate plan has always been known to have less potential to save money than a package of deeper benefit cuts approved by the Illinois House and backed by Nekritz, so it's unclear whether Tuesday's numbers will make any difference in the debate. The House plan has been estimated to save about $28 billion out of the state's $100 billion in debt.

A spokesman for Senate President John Cullerton, a Chicago Democrat, said the pension funds haven't "provided a complete and accurate study" yet.

He and union leaders argue the House plan is more likely than theirs to get struck down by the courts, resulting in no savings.

That bill "seeks to illegally slash the life savings and contributions of working and retired Illinois families, and any alleged savings to the state are a totqal illusion," read a statement from the We Are One Illinois union coalition.

Senger and Nekritz tried to downplay the conflict between House and Senate leaders over how to solve one of the state's most pressing financial problems.

But with 10 days before the legislature's scheduled adjournment, the competing bills in the two chambers are far apart.

For a deal to get done, both chambers have to approve the same bill and send it to Gov. Pat Quinn, and neither side has showed signs of backing down.

Share this page
Comments ()
Guidelines: Keep it civil and on topic; no profanity, vulgarity, slurs or personal attacks. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked. If a comment violates these standards or our terms of service, click the X in the upper right corner of the comment box. To find our more, read our FAQ.
    help here